1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 8. 21. 인천 남구 학익동에 있는 인천지방법원 제322호 법정에서 위 법원 2013고정2024호 C, D에 대한 폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해) 사건의 증인으로 출석하여 선서한 다음, “E과 F한테 발로 밟혀서 바닥에 누워 있었나요”라는 변호인의 질문에 “2명이 아니라 더 있었습니다”라고 대답하고, “그때 있었던 사람이 F과 E 외에 더 있었나요”라는 변호사의 질문에 “예”라고 대답하고, “그때 G이나 H이도 그 화장실에 있었나요”라는 변호사의 질문에 “예, 걔네들도 있었습니다”라고 대답하고, “일방적으로 맞고 있었지요”라는 변호사의 질문에 “예. 여러 명이서 두 사람을 계속 밟았습니다”라고 대답하였다.

However, in fact, F, E’s daily activities, G, and H had never been in the toilet change column at the time when the Defendant was in the toilet change, H was only in the above toilet to F, E, and C, and not in the absence of C, while G did not have been in the toilet.

Ultimately, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory as above, and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused, and a protocol concerning the prosecution of the accused;

1. A copy of the examination protocol of the witness (part of the second examination protocol) to the accused, a copy of the examination protocol of the accused (part of the third examination protocol) to the accused (section 84 of the investigation record);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to F a copy of the protocol of examination of witness (part of the third protocol of trial) (section 27 of the investigation record), copy of protocol of examination of witness (section 45 of the third protocol of trial) to E, copy of protocol of examination of witness (section 45 of the investigation record), copy of protocol of examination of witness to H (section 65 of the third protocol of trial), copy of protocol of examination of witness to G (section of the third protocol of trial) (section 75 of the investigation record);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;