Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving buses C.

On June 9, 2016, the Defendant driven the above bus around 14:30 on June 14, 2016, and driven the four-lane road in front of the Doo-gu, Seosan-si, Seosan-si, Seosan-si, along four-lanes from the front apartment to the private distance of the art park.

Since there is a place in which a crosswalk is installed, in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to stop at any time for the safety of pedestrians, such as driving a pedestrian, by examining whether there is a pedestrian who has already entered the crosswalk at the right and right, and also having a attitude to stop at any time for the safety of pedestrians, such as driving a pedestrian, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and got the victim E (the 72 years old) who dried the crosswalk to the right side from the left side of the road in the direction of the defendant's course by negligence, and received the front part of the above bus.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Spa

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A written diagnosis of E;

1. A report on the actual condition of traffic accidents (1) (2);

1. Photographs related to accidents;

1. It is denied that the Defendant and his defense counsel violated the duty of care to protect pedestrians under Article 3(2) proviso of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents even though he recognizes that the Defendant violated his duty of care to protect pedestrians.

However, as the defendant violated the duty of care for the prevention of occurrence of an accident as stated in the judgment of the defendant and the defendant's defense counsel, so long as the victim's punishment is not recognized, the issue of whether the defendant violated the duty of protection of pedestrians under Article 3 (2) 6 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents should be examined further.