Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five million won.
Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person engaged in urban bus driving service.
On February 6, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 17:30, and proceeded with a four-lane road in front of the home fluor, which is located in the Geumdong-dong, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, in the same way, at the direction of the Gangnam apartment located in the same Dong-dong, the Defendant was driving at a speed of about 15 km at the speed, depending on four-lanes to the police box of the same Dong-dong.
Since crosswalks are installed on the front side, in such a case, there was a duty of care to confirm whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a way to reduce speed and to see well the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and to drive the motor vehicle safely.
Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the Defendant did not discover the victim D (e.g., 54 years old) who was standing a crosswalk from the right side of the bus to the left side in accordance with the new subparagraph, and had the victim use it on the floor by shocking the victim into the front part of the right side of the bus.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as cerebral cerebrovassis, which requires approximately 12 weeks medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A written statement related to a traffic accident;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;
1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the degree of injury of a victim is not minor, but the defendant agreed with the victim, the victim sought the preference against the defendant, the defendant is against himself/herself, and there are no criminal records of the same kind after 2007);
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;