The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The ground for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is added to the evidence submitted in this

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment under the following paragraph (2).

2. The addition;

A. In light of the following circumstances, the Plaintiff’s grounds of appeal for the instant case (i.e., 1glue tree 1glue tree 1glue tree 1glue tree) may be acknowledged to have been dead due to the instant accident.

① On May 30, 2018, after the instant accident occurred, the instant trees began to be dead from the end of July 2018, even though the leafs were to be infinited on the remaining land.

In light of the above circumstances, it is difficult to view that the tree of this case was manufactured more in the process of transplanting the tree of this case, or that the tree of this case was dead because of excessive planting operations.

② A surveyer G determined that the leaked dump’s quantity was less than 10liters, and when a hydrotension dump is covered by the ppuri surface of trees, even where the roots of trees is dead. The instant accident should be deemed to have influenced the tests of trees of this case.

B. In full view of all the circumstances described in the judgment of the court of first instance, the evidence presented in the judgment of the court of first instance, the result of the request for the supplementation of appraisal and supplementation to appraiser E by the court of first instance, and the following circumstances acknowledged by the purport of the entire pleadings, it is difficult to view that the trees of this case were dead due to the instant accident, and during the process of transplanting the instant trees, it is reasonable to view that the trees of this case were manufactured more considerably than the size of the parts of the instant trees, and that they were dead normally due to excessive timbering operations.