logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.24 2015가단5169251
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 101,035,982 to the Plaintiff; and (b) 5% per annum from October 31, 2013 to November 24, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) B is a private taxi (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 00:25 October 31, 2013, around October 31, 2013.

(2) The Plaintiff’s driving of the Plaintiff’s driving, who was in the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, was in the front part of the head of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”), and was in the front part of the main part of the Plaintiff’s driving, who was in the front part of the main part of the Plaintiff’s driving, and was in the front part of the export bridge from the two apartment rooms to the front side of the export bridge (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) As a result of the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as flaver pulver and flaversing on the right upper part of the uppermost, e.g., e., e., b

3) The Defendant is a mutual aid project operator who entered into a mutual aid agreement on Defendant vehicle. The Defendant is responsible for compensating the Plaintiff for damages caused by the instant accident as a mutual aid project operator of Defendant vehicle. (c) The Defendant asserts that there was negligence by entering the intersection in violation of the instant signal. The Plaintiff’s access to the intersection around the time when the signal, etc. at the front intersection was changed to yellow signal was changed to yellow signal, but it is unclear whether the Plaintiff’s access to the intersection was immediately changed to yellow signal, and immediately after the change was made. However, even if the Plaintiff entered the intersection immediately after the change to yellow signal, the Defendant’s failure to stop or turn left without making a turn to the left is the main cause of the instant accident. Considering the above circumstances and the Plaintiff’s violation of the obligation to comply with the designation of the lane, the Defendant’s negligence caused by the instant accident and the expansion of damages shall be deemed to be 20% of the Plaintiff’s fault, and there is no dispute over the Plaintiff’s liability to limit the Plaintiff’s liability by 15-15-17).

arrow