1. The Defendant’s KRW 96,453,157 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from July 17, 201 to August 11, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. B, around 00:27 on July 17, 201, driving a Cschtonton car (hereinafter “Defendant’s car”) and driving the shooting distance in front of the macro-ocopon on the high speed speed at the time of the macro-oception from the sloping interview to the bus terminal, and turn to the right to the right to the high speed distance at the port of the intersection.

Since the on-and-off signal turn on the intersection, B temporarily stops or travels at the intersection before entering the intersection, while neglecting the duty of care to make a left-hand turn so that it does not interfere with the passage of other vehicles, while neglecting the duty of care to make a left-hand turn at the right-hand turn while neglecting it and neglecting it, the front part of the DOba (hereinafter “Plaintiff Oba”) driven by the Plaintiff A, who was on the left-hand turn at the right-hand line, was shocked into the front part of the Defendant’s car. Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the alley of the upper left-hand pelle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the defendant automobile.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, and 6 (including branch numbers for those with additional numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the instant accident as the insurer of the defendant's automobile.

B. Limit of liability: (a) Plaintiff Oraba and Defendant No. 1 appears to have entered the intersection similar to that of the intersection; and (b) the Plaintiff also entered the intersection and did not properly consider the movement of Defendant No. 1 while entering the intersection; and (c) such error was caused by the occurrence of the instant case and the expansion of damages.

As such, the defendant's liability is limited to 80% in consideration of the circumstances and circumstances of the accident in this case.

In this regard, the defendant is in accordance with Article 16 of the Enforcement Rules of the Road Traffic Act.