The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around March 6, 2014, around 20:30 on March 6, 2014, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case sold to E (17), a juvenile, the juvenile, at the Dhop for the operation of the Defendant located in Sungnam-si and the 17th floor, two weeks and two weeks and one week, which are drugs harmful to juveniles, to E (17).

2. The Defendant asserted that he was not a juvenile when verifying the identification card of E before the title of this case, and that he did not know that E was a juvenile at the time of this case.

3. We examine the judgment, and the witness E visited the defendant on March 4, 2014, which was prior to the instant framework, from this court, on March 4, 2014, and at the time of birth, the defendant presented the identification card of a person other than a juvenile for 1994. This is consistent with the defendant's statement that he had already verified the identification card of E and that he was not a juvenile, and there is no evidence to prove that the defendant knew that E was a juvenile at the time of the instant case.

4. According to the conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting the crime, and thus, the court acquitted the defendant under the latter part of Article 325