logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.09.28 2016나304131
임대차계약서무효확인 등
Text

1. To dismiss the instant lawsuit that has been changed in exchange at the trial;

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of C 4,228.1 square meters, D 3,319.7 square meters, E 3,852 square meters, and E 3,852 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) at the time of residence in the district of a farmland remodeling project in the area of a farmland in the area of a farmland rearrangement project in the area of a divided yellow 3 district, and the Defendant is the

B. On September 9, 2010, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a written request for an agreement on compensation for losses, stating that “The period of consultation between September 9, 2010 to October 26, 2010, totaling KRW 40,673,30, the owner of the Plaintiff, and the farmer (the recipient of the compensation) B” was “B.”

C. On February 17, 2011, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a letter of urge for consultation on compensation for losses, stating that “The Plaintiff shall receive KRW 20,336,650 of farming compensation equivalent to 50% of the instant land to respond to consultation again.”

On December 9, 2010, the Defendant paid KRW 1,60,000 to F, his son’s 2773,330,00,00 for obstacles to C’s 1,60,000 at the time of stay in F, who is his/her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s 1436-5, 2012, the Defendant paid KRW 41,573,30 on the ground that the son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.

E. B died on July 21, 2010.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap's 1 through 5 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the legitimacy of the instant lawsuit

A. In a lawsuit for confirmation, there must be the benefit of confirmation as a requirement for the protection of rights, and the benefit of confirmation is the most effective to obtain a confirmation judgment against the defendant, in order to eliminate ineasure, danger, and danger in the Plaintiff’s rights or legal status.

arrow