1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Under the underlying facts, each of the following facts is recognized by the descriptions of Gap evidence 1 through 14, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 11, 1314, Eul evidence No. 16-1, 2, Eul evidence No. 17 through 19, 222 attached to the tin of February 11, 2012.

A. On April 12, 2010, the Defendant announced a compensation plan for the said farmland remodeling project, the project implementer, the Defendant, as the Defendant, to which the project implementer was the Defendant, on the following grounds: (a) on the project name B, C, D, E, F, G district farmland remodeling project; (b) on the ground that farmland located in the H river dredging soil for the purpose of the project was re-developed as farmland; and (c) on the ground that the agricultural environment improvement and farmland inundation was resolved; (d) on the project period from December 31, 2011 to December

B. On June 30, 2010, the Defendant obtained approval of an implementation plan with respect to each project district, I, J, C, and D, the scheduled project period from June 30, 201 to December 2011.

C. On September 9, 2010, the Defendant owned K 4228.1 square meter, L 319.7 square meter, M 3852 square meter, etc. at the time of residence in the D District, and sent the consultation period to the Plaintiff, who is a farmer residing in the time of residence in the said farmland, located at the time of residence, which is the seat of the said farmland, along with the “request for consultation on compensation for losses for the project for remodeling of farmland in the D District” with the period of consultation as between September 9, 2010 and October 26, 2010, the “request for consultation on compensation for losses for the project for remodeling of farmland in the D District” as well as the “written request for consultation on compensation for losses for the project for remodeling of farmland in the D District” with the land size, unit price (two years), 3567.90 won, total sum of the incorporated area, 40,673,30 won, owners, and farmers (persons entitled to compensation).

On September 27, 2010, N, who cultivated the above three parcels to the Defendant in the year 2009, died during cancer treatment on July 21, 2010, and his/her family, including his/her child, is not engaged in agriculture by moving to the Si of Gu and Si around 2009. There was no fact that the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with N, but the Plaintiff filed an objection with N, by filing a false report as if N was leased from March 1, 2009 to March 1, 2012, stating that the said compensation would be paid to the Plaintiff in full.

E. The Defendant on October 4, 2010, and the cultivator on August 8, 2010.