The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The Defendant is a person employed and worked on the part of the CConsolidated Management Body. The Defendant: “Around June 28, 2012, at the request of E, a large right holder of C building, removed a parking lot parking management unit in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which is owned by C Integration Management Body, and arrested the police as a flagrant offender of property damage and between them. In relation to this, the Defendant destroyed the above special vehicle by taking advantage of the dryle to prevent the victim from driving the above special vehicle without having the victim compensate for the damage caused by the property damage on June 11, 2012.

2. Determination

A. The statements that correspond to the facts charged in the instant case include H, D, I’s legal and investigative agency statements, the legal statement of J, E’s investigative agency’s statement, E’s photographic status of crime (section 83, 84 of the investigation record), vehicle inspection/maintenance estimate (section 335 of the investigation record, page 335 of the investigation record), etc.

【Listening to the statement by a witness who accepted the damaged vehicle(Investigation Record No. 546 pages), hearing report by the owner of the damaged vehicle(Investigation Record No. 548), hearing report by the witness who observed the damaged vehicle(Investigation Record No. 550 pages), hearing report by the witness who heard the damaged vehicle(Investigation Record No. 550 pages), witness H and K hearing report by the witness(Investigation Record No. 546 page of the damaged vehicle) are inadmissible because the defendant

Each evidence is examined.

(1) 범행 상황 사진에 의하면, 피고인이 판시 공소사실 기재 일시장소에서 피해자 소유 특장차(이하 ‘피해 차량’이라 한다)의 바퀴 부근에서 전동드릴을 손에 쥔채 모종의 작업을 하는 모습이 관찰되고, 특히 수사기록 제83면의 범행 상황 사진에서 보여지는 피고인의 전동드릴의 파지 상태, 타이어의 위치 등을 고려하면, 전동드릴을 이용하여 피고인이...