logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.09.10 2020고단1448
업무상과실치사
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for one year.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the above sentence shall be executed.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

A is the chief of the school affairs of Seo-gu Daejeon and the chief of the 32th class, and the defendant B is the chief of the 35th class of the same school.

Defendant

A, around July 6, 2017, anniversary of the completion of the 3rd anniversary of the end of the 1st semester of middle school, A left the water play in the 32th half of the students of the 32th half of the students of the 1st half of the 32th half of the 3st half of the 3st half of the 3st half of the 3st half of the 3st half of the 3st half of the 1st half of the 3st half of the 3st half of the 2017, and the defendant B proposed to participate in the above water play.

At the same time, the above panty valley, which is a water play place, is larger than a flood vehicle, and the depth of which is about 2 meters, has been cut off, and the prices had a warning sign stating " deep water depth - it is deep that the depth is dangerous, and the water play is at the time." Therefore, if the students of a private teaching institute who are under 14 years of age are performing water play without sufficient safety measures in the above valley, it was a place where there is a high risk of a water-related accident.

In this case, the defendants engaged in the duty of safety of the private teaching institute students by measuring the depth in advance, etc., and by wearing safety devices, such as life jackets, to the private teaching institute students participating in the physical play, and educating the private teaching institute students only in the safe zone, and there was a duty of care to prevent the private teaching institute students from occurring in advance by regularly supervising the private teaching institute students.

Nevertheless, the Defendants neglected this and did not conduct any safety education for private teaching institutes in advance other than the oral care that they should not enter a deep place, and did not provide safety supplies, including life jackets, and even if they reported that male teaching institutes are playing in the vicinity of the depth of the depth, they did not return to the price by negligence.

arrow