beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 53,577,388 to Plaintiff A, KRW 54,477,388 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 2,00,000 to Plaintiff C.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. At around 17:00 on July 31, 2015, D, who was enrolled in the fifth grade of an elementary school, performed water play without wearing life jackets, etc. along with Plaintiff C and Eindinants, F, etc., located in a local river (hereinafter “the instant river”) located in the former E-village, North Korea-gun, North Korea, without wearing life jackets, etc., and went back to a water play zone where the depth of the upper stream is defied and the depth of water was defied to a water play zone, the water play at around 17:30, where water depth was defied.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)
Plaintiff
A and B are parents of D (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) and Plaintiff C are omitted.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiffs asserted that the river of this case is a water play zone every year and the place of accident is a water play zone where the death accident occurred. Thus, the defendants who are responsible for the safety management of the river of this case have the duty to take protective measures, such as installing a sign to prevent access to the place of accident or a sign to warn the risk of the dys accident, and installing a safe line for entry and exit prevention, etc., even though they did not have sufficient physical protective facilities, and since the accident of this case occurred by neglecting the management duty of the safety management personnel assigned to the river of this case to leave the site at the time of the accident, the defendants are responsible for compensating the damages suffered by the plaintiffs as the managers of the place of accident of this case.
3. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The river of this case is a local river, which has jurisdiction over its location pursuant to Article 8(2) of the River Act, and the actual management agency of this case is the Governor of Jeollabuk-do or the Governor of Jeollabuk-do.