Plaintiff, Appellant
Plaintiff (Law Firm LLC, Attorneys Shin Jae-soo et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)
Defendant, appellant and appellant
Head of the District Tax Office
Conclusion of Pleadings
September 3, 2014
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2013Guhap10700 decided January 23, 2014
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
The defendant's rejection disposition against the plaintiff on December 26, 2012 as to the claim for rectification of global income tax for the tax years from 202 to 2010 as stated in the attached Table "the amount of tax requested for rectification" in the attached Table for the plaintiff shall be revoked.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
The reasoning of this court's judgment is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment, and thus, it refers to Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.
[Attachment]
Judges’ aid (Presiding Judge) Transfering of permanent equipment