The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. There are extenuating circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, that the defendant agreed to pay the amount of damage to the victims of the theft except for one foreign victim, or deposited the amount of damage, and that the defendant has no record of punishment for suspension of execution or heavier punishment until the date of suspension of execution.

However, since the crime of this case was committed by the defendant who intrudes into a structure located in the Corporation and steals or attempted to steals cash located therein, the nature of the crime is not somewhat weak in that the defendant repeats the crime several times for a period of about one year, but the defendant has been already punished four times, and there is a high possibility of criticism in that the defendant already committed the crime of this case even though he had been punished four times.

Taking into account the circumstances above, the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.