The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (one year and four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. There are extenuating circumstances for the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and divided his mistake, and that most victims of the larceny do not want the punishment of the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case is likely to be criticized in that the defendant acquired money under the name of the sales proceeds of the Internet game account three times, stolen or attempted to steals cash and goods by entering a church and a senior citizen center, etc. over 22 times, and withdrawn cash from the automatic cash payment machine using a stolen passbook, and the nature of the crime is not less than 8 million won in total, and the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of it, even though he was in the period of suspension of execution.

Taking into account the circumstances above, the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.