logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.05.13 2014고단446 (1)
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 446"

1. The accused is a person who is engaged in driving a CNA driver car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, violation of the Road Traffic Act, violation of the Road Traffic Act, violation of the Road Traffic Act, and violation of the Road Traffic Act;

On December 31, 2013, the Defendant, at least 0.05% of blood alcohol content at 04:00 on December 31, 2013, and under the influence of alcohol below 0.1%, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, was driving the NAS car from the right to the hospital located in the front of the YY YY, Gocheon-si Intersection, Gocheon-si, Gocheon-si without a driver’s license, to proceed bypass.

In such cases, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to change the vehicle to an out-of-way lane and drive the right edge of the relevant motor vehicle, while making a right edge.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was able to take the part on the left part of the victim E(the 37-year-old driver) driving in the direction of the signal while driving the central line. The Defendant got the front part of the freight vehicle to the front part of the freight vehicle. The Defendant was also under the influence of alcohol and had the front part of the freight vehicle again.

The Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained injury to the above victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, the above Coina did not immediately stop the cargo vehicle to take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim, while destroying it to the extent that the amount equivalent to KRW 1,104,378, such as the replacement of the front-hander.

2. No person who intends to operate an automobile in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate the road without purchasing a mandatory insurance policy;

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not subscribe to mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, but operated the said Nos. 44 as above.

The defendant of "2015 Highest 278".

arrow