A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence subparagraph 9 shall be forfeited from the accused.

No. 7 of this title.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 21:00, at the construction site of the said new building in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, opened an entrance by manipulating the password of the entrance, which was known to him/her at the construction site of the said new building, and then intrudes into the entrance, and stolen it with one set of Nowon-gu, the victimF-owned market price of KRW 800,000,000.

2. Highest 2013No2364;

(a) No person violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall take over the means of access;

On June 2013, the Defendant was unable to open an account under his/her name due to bad credit standing in the lower patrolman, and the Defendant decided to purchase the physical card and password from the person under whose name the Defendant came to know through the Internet website at KRW 150,000.

around that time, the Defendant was issued a new e-mail card (credit number G) and a password, which sent by the winners of the above name through Kwikset Service Articles, at the front of the branch of the foreign exchange bank located in the Mayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired the means of access from the above person who was not the victim.

B. At around 01:40 on September 3, 2013, the Defendant discovered the victim H who was locked in front of the Gunar calendar of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and then cut off one copy of the foreign exchange card, one driver’s license, one resident registration certificate, one cash 30,000 won, one new card with the victim’s wife I, and one national physical fitness card.

C. On August 2013, the Defendant acquired one driver’s license and one driver’s license lost by the victim C, which was lost at the front of the Seoyangyangyang-dong Island in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

The Defendant did not take necessary procedures, such as returning each property acquired as above to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant occupies each victim.