logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.03.28 2017누69023
징수금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the submission or addition of a part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the following Paragraph 2. Thus, it shall be accepted as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

(hereinafter the meaning of the terms used in this Court shall be as follows. 2. 2. Cutk or added each Note 2 through 8. 7) to each Note 1 to each Note 6. 6) The term "this Court" and "this Court" in Part 6 of Part 1 and Part 7 shall both be read as "In Mancheon District Court". The term "No. 6 through 11. 1. 1.

The main point of the party's assertion is that the plaintiff's claim for the payment of the final judgment amount and the delayed payment amount (the plaintiff appealed only within the scope of the above monetary amount). The defendant asserts that the plaintiff's claim for the liquidation money (hereinafter "claim of this case") against the defendant was already transferred to a third party, and thus the plaintiff cannot claim payment. Accordingly, the plaintiff again asserts that the claim of this case is impossible to be transferred due to its nature, and there was no effective resolution on the assignment of claim, and that the transfer of claim is not effective because the claim of this case occurred due to illegal acts, such as loan fraud, breach of trust, etc. by the head of the previous association, and that the transfer of claim of this case was not effective since the plaintiff had no authority to directly claim the defendant by February 26, 2014, which the head of the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City refused to collect the collection commission. Therefore, the transfer of claim of this case made before is

The 12th to 6th of the 19th of the Act shall be followed by the following:

The transfer of the claim of this case.

arrow