beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the parts to be filled or added below, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Of the 5 pages of the judgment of the first instance, one of the 4 pages 10-6 pages of the judgment of the first instance, “this Court” has been decided to be “In Mancheon District Court.” The 10-6 pages of the judgment of the first instance include “from October 25 to the date of full payment” as “15% per annum, which is the rate prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (hereinafter “the Act on the Promotion, etc.”) established by the board of representatives, from October 25 to the date of full payment.” The 14 pages of the judgment of the first instance and 15-side 6 pages of the judgment of the first instance, the following are added. (The Plaintiff asserts that the time when the head of Incheon Metropolitan City of Incheon Metropolitan City, who could request the Defendant to collect the claim of this case, constitutes a claim against the non-entitled person who did not collect the claim of this case, and thus, there is no probability that the transfer of the claim of this case would occur in the future after the transfer of the claim of this case.
However, as seen earlier, whether a cooperative is commissioned to collect from the head of the competent Si/Gun is related to the possibility of filing a claim for the settlement money, and it is irrelevant to the occurrence and reversion of the claim for the settlement money. Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion
제1심판결서 15쪽 11행 “이율 � 상환방법”을 “이율 및 상환방법”으로 고친다.
At the bottom of the 15th judgment of the first instance, “The court shall take advantage of these facts,” and at the bottom, “the plaintiff shall take advantage of these facts.”