logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.07.11 2018고단1684
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 8, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around the Busan Central Police Station located in Busan Central Police Station, the Defendant: (b) around the Busan Central Police Station located in Busan Central District on March 8, 2018; (c) around the victim B (63 years) boarding a cab and asked the victim whether the victim had the money to pay the taxi expenses in the field of Yeongdeungpodo; and (d) under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant would be deemed to have the victim paid the taxi expenses, i.e., “I will pay the taxi expenses.” (c) the Defendant reported on the 112-lane of the franch and reported on the 1

In the end, after he saw, he saw "I am," and assaulted the victim by breaking the bat of the victim's bat with his hand.

2. On March 8, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports from the above taxi engineer on March 21:13, 2018, and arrested a flagrant offender into the police district of the Busan Central Police Station D police station by means of assault, unfrighting car, etc., and arrested him/her on the earth; (b) took a bath that he/she was "Chewing baby" on the ground that he/she was arrested by the police station D, etc. belonging to the Busan Central Police Station D police station; and (c) tried to use his/her cell phone carrying machine used for E face twice in his/her hand on his/her hand; and (d) tried to use his/her knebb by pling the bucker of his/her border, etc. on one occasion; and (d) tried to use his/her kneb by ploring his/her kne on the same ground that he/she did not use his/her kne on the part of the police station.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and investigation of crimes by the police officer's 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for B and E;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Application of each CCTV photograph and video statute;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 260(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts (the choice of imprisonment).

arrow