1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 250,746,482, and the Plaintiff B’s money KRW 245,746,482, and each of the said money, from July 6, 2017.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Fact 1) C is a DNA bus around 21:35 on July 6, 2017 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

) When driving the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul) and driving the front road E along the first bus-only bus-only bus-only bus-only bus-only bus-only bus-only bus signal has been changed to a red, while driving the front road from the intersection of the mountain intersection to the intersection of the mountain intersection, the signal for the front bus-only bus-only bus-only bus-only vehicle has been changed to the red, and is proceeding as it is while the signaled on the right side at a three-lane, and turn to the left normally pursuant to the new subparagraph of the left turn to the left.

) The left side part of the Defendant’s vehicle’s left side was shocked to the right side of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) On July 17, 2017, F died of cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Spon.

(hereinafter referred to as “F.” 3) The Plaintiffs are the parents of the Deceased, who are successors, and the Defendant is the mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant’s vehicle. [The grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, and the evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 12 (including the land number; hereinafter the same shall apply) is included

each entry, video, and the purport of the whole oral proceedings

B. According to the above findings of recognition of liability, as the deceased died due to the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, the Defendant is liable to compensate the deceased and the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the instant accident as the insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring special circumstances.

C. The judgment on the limitation of liability has entered the Defendant’s vehicle to report that the signals exclusive for the bus exclusive prior to the entry of the stop line were changed to yellow, and the accident of this case occurred by making the deceased’s straight signal changed to yellow signal prior to the change to the left turn turn, and by making the deceased’s early entry into the intersection and turn to the left at a rapid speed. In addition, the deceased’s failure to wear the safety cap affected the expansion of damages. Therefore, in calculating the amount of damages to be compensated by the Defendant, these errors should be taken into account.