logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.08.21 2018고단1389 (1)
보험사기방지특별법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

With B known through mobile phone display, the Defendant used the circumstance that insurance money is paid only by a simple investigation, such as telephone conversations with the perpetrator and the victim, without confirming the scene of an employee of an insurance company, in the case of an ordinary minor car accident, by using a simple investigation, such as telephone conversations with the victim. Even though a traffic accident did not occur, the Defendant was willing to receive insurance money by filing a false report with the insurance company as if there was a person who

As a result, B called an automobile insurance company to which a harming Vehicle was subscribed as if it were a driver of a harming Vehicle, and claimed insurance money as if there was a traffic accident, and the defendant conspireds to divide insurance money paid to the defendant by one half after deceiving the insurance company by confirming that there was a traffic accident in the automobile insurance company to which a harming Vehicle was admitted.

B On April 17, 2017, as discussed above, received a traffic accident stating that “B is D, and 2, Jung-gu, Daegu-gu, Jung-gu, 01:00 on April 17, 2017, Dong-dong 2, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul, received a traffic accident that “The E-benz car driven by the Defendant at the F Albi-gu, Do-dong 2, which was driven by the Defendant.”

After the receipt of the incident B, the Defendant was issued KRW 7,280,610 from the victims four times in total, as shown in attached Table 2, from May 15, 2017, including the following: (a) the Defendant, despite the absence of a traffic accident, by telephone from the victim; and (b) the fact, despite the absence of a traffic accident, by the victim; and (c) the Defendant, by deceiving the victim of the said accident; and (d) received a total of KRW 1,862,150 from the victim as personal agreement compensation, etc., from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. A suspect interrogation protocol concerning B by the prosecution;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against Defendant, G, and H;

1. Each police officer to I, J, and K.

arrow