logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.02.08 2018고단1389
보험사기방지특별법위반
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, along with E that they came to know through mobile phone display, used the circumstance that insurance money is paid only by simple investigation, such as telephone conversations with the perpetrator and the victim, without confirming the scene of an insurance company’s employees in the case of a minor car accident, with the intention to receive insurance money by making a false report to the insurance company as if there was a person who was damaged due to a traffic accident even though the occurrence of a traffic accident did not occur.

Accordingly, E calls from an automobile insurance company to which a harming Vehicle was subscribed as if it were a driver of a harming Vehicle, and claims insurance money as if there were traffic accidents, and the Defendants deceptioned the insurance company by confirming that there was a traffic accident upon the confirmation of the telephone in the automobile insurance company to which the victimized Vehicle was a member of the harming Vehicle, and conspired to divide insurance money paid to the Defendants into half.

1. On May 8, 2017, Defendant A received a traffic accident stating that “A NAS car driven by Defendant A is driven by C before the victim FF Co., Ltd. was sent to H apartment signal, etc. on May 8, 2017, in front of the victim FF Co., Ltd., 10:00 Seoul Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H apartment signal, etc., the INAS car driven by C, and the Defendant was driven by JWM car.”

After the receipt of E’s accident, the Defendant was issued KRW 17,052,60,00 from the victims on a total of six occasions as shown in attached Table 1, from August 8, 2017, as shown in attached Table 1, by deceiving the victim by a method of responding to the occurrence of the above accident, despite the absence of a traffic accident, and receiving KRW 5,733,300 from the victim, such as personal agreement compensation, etc.

2. Defendant B E calls to the victim KK Co., Ltd. on April 4, 2017 and calls to “B,” and on April 4, 2017.

arrow