1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against Plaintiff A in the judgment is modified as follows.

The Defendants jointly do so.

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition and revision below, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

The following shall be added to the end of the 21st instance judgment on the fourth page.

However, the responsibility of Defendant E shall be limited to 90% in consideration of the circumstances of the instant accident, etc.

The following shall be added between the 5th and 16th of the first instance judgment:

(C) Limitation on liability by Defendant E’s ratio: KRW 1,289,750 (i.e., KRW 1,43,056 x 90%) 5 pages 17 through 10, as follows.

If the victim who received insurance benefits under the National Health Insurance Act, files a claim for damages against a third party, the amount of damages calculated first shall be offset by negligence, and the amount of damages shall be calculated by deducting insurance benefits from the amount of damages, and the National Health Insurance Corporation shall be subrogated to acquire the amount of damages equivalent to the amount of such insurance benefits (see Supreme Court Decision 2002Da50149, Dec. 26, 2002). The whole purport of arguments in the statement in Evidence A 10-1 through 7, 9 through 12, and 16 is as follows: (a) the Plaintiff’s whole medical expenses (this case’s accident shall not be recognized as proximate causal relation; (b) 6.1.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.6.1 of the instant accident; and (c) 3,51,541, 301, 301.6.38.61,38.61.6.6