logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2020.02.19 2020고단86
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud against the victim B;

A. On November 7, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement that “I would receive a high interest if I would lend money to I wish to play for the number of days in E located in the following cities: I would like to receive a high interest.”

However, in fact, the Defendant intended to use part of the money borrowed from the victim for personal use, such as sports discussions and personal business funds, and was using one’s name “fluoring” in order to show that the money was properly used for a proper number of days, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay to the victim high interest with the number of days play, even if he borrowed money from the victim.

On November 13, 2017, the Defendant received from the victim each remittance of KRW 10,000,000 from the victim, and KRW 10,000,000 on December 11, 2017, and acquired it by fraud.

B. On November 9, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “I will use only 2-3 days and complete the payment without problem, on the part of the victim at an influent place.”

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim as above, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay it to the victim.

The Defendant received KRW 2,00,000 on the same day from the victim as the borrowed money, from that time until January 26, 2018, and acquired KRW 43,90,000 in total through the above 23 times as shown in the attached crime list (1) from that time.

C. On December 2, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim “If the Defendant had been frightened by the police while gambling in Korea and had been frightened at that time, the police should be purchased, and there is no money to be used for that purpose, and then the Defendant borrowed frighten.”

However, the defendant was subject to seizure of money by controlling the police.

arrow