The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The defendant would not drive without a license again.

The circumstances, etc. are recognized.

However, the defendant had been sentenced to a suspended sentence for six months due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving) in 2006 and had been sentenced to a suspended sentence for six months, and in particular, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for six months due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving) and a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) on November 10, 2016 and was sentenced to a suspended sentence for ten months on November 18, 2016, and again committed a non-licensed driving of this case during the suspended sentence period. Traffic-related crimes, such as non-licensed driving, etc., may cause significant harm to unspecified people. In addition, comprehensively taking account of the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant's assertion that the sentence of the court below is too unfair because it is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.