The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. That the defendant would not once again drive drinking or drive without a license;

The circumstances, etc. are recognized.

However, the defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in 2003; one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving); seven months of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act around 2008; and the defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act on March 22, 2017; and the defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence for a violation of the Road Traffic Act on March 30, 2017; and again committed the instant crime during the period of suspended sentence for a period of three months after the judgment became final and conclusive on March 30, 2017; the driving of drinking, etc. is highly likely to cause serious harm to other unspecified persons; the defendant's age, sex and family environment; the motive, means, and result of the instant crime; thus, the defendant's assertion that there is no reason to believe that the defendant's punishment is undue.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.