logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.10.17 2017나33418
임대차보증금 반환 등
Text

1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance, which orders payment below, shall be against the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H Ground Building (hereinafter “instant building”) was owned by B, and the ownership transfer registration was completed to C on May 16, 2013 due to the donation on May 14, 2013. The extension registration of the instant building was completed on February 19, 2014.

B. The defendant is a licensed real estate agent of the J Real Estate Office and D is a brokerage assistant of the defendant.

C. B, around April 13, 2013, between D and D, entered into an agreement and an exclusive agreement with respect to the remodeling construction and lease of the instant building (hereinafter “instant exclusive agreement”) with the following content.

B is responsible for the tenant name map of the building in this case and cooperates with documents concerning remodeling (large-scale repair)/lease.

D shall bear the costs incurred in relation to the construction, new construction, the first floor, the total remodeling (large-scale repair)/lease of the second floor of the building in this case, and shall act on behalf of the exclusive licensee for each year.

D The date of lease of the construction-related and the building in question will be difficult and best to specify the date.

The total rent shall be 210,000 won, monthly, 18,300,000 won, and B and D shall proceed through consultation.

Expenses of D used in the said remodeling work shall be covered by D as premium, and it shall not be required to B in entirety.

On September 2013, the Plaintiff, via the brokerage assistant E of the I Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, was introduced as a broker assistant D of the J Licensed Real Estate Agent Office (hereinafter “instant store”). D presented to the Plaintiff a construction contract concluded between B and B on the basis of the instant exclusive contract and the instant exclusive contract.

E. On October 5, 2013, the Plaintiff issued to D a letter of intent and undertaking for commercial lease with the following contents, and remitted premium of KRW 3.5 million to D’s bank account.

. Lease of commercial buildings;

arrow