1. The decision of the court of first instance, including the claim extended by the plaintiff A in this court, is in accordance with paragraphs (1) and (2) below.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties 1) Plaintiff A is from D to E E E E E’s vehicle from August 5, 2017 (hereinafter “instant damaged vehicle”).

(2) The Plaintiff purchased KRW 25,00,000 (contract amounting to KRW 25,50,000,000, and KRW 22,500,000) for all accidents that occur from the time of the acquisition of a motor vehicle. The Plaintiff paid the down payment to D on the day of the contract, and received the said vehicle. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff Company A operated an orchard (KIKO) in the Hadong-dong F, Gyeong-dong, Gyeong-dong, Seoul, with the Plaintiff’s spouse, together with the Plaintiff, with the Plaintiff Company B. (hereinafter “instant Ham-si”), G was the driver of the International QM5 Motor Vehicle owned by H (hereinafter “instant Ham-si”). H concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant, the insurer, with respect to the said Ham-si.

B. At around 10:20 on August 12, 2017, G was driving the instant Maritime Vehicle, along the two-lanes at a point of 375 km from the border road located in Pyeongtaek-ri, Dongcheon-ri, and the previous vehicle was rapidly parked in the vehicle due to the vehicle’s engine, and the previous vehicle was changed to the three-lane, while discovering the damaged vehicle in the instant case where the vehicle was driven in the three-lanes, and plucked to the left-hand left-hand side of the said damaged vehicle, but the vehicle was found to have been driven in the three-lanes, but it was not possible to find the damaged vehicle in the instant case where the water was driven in the three-lanes, and the part was shocked by the front-hand side of the said damaged vehicle.

In the future, the above Maritime Vehicle, which was pushed ahead of the J, has moved back to the right edge of the above Maritime Vehicle, and there was a conflict with the above Maritime Vehicle among the vehicles in front of the left side due to the first shock, while the Maritime Vehicle in front of the Maritime Vehicle in front of the left side and being pushed ahead of it.

(hereinafter the above traffic accident is referred to as “instant accident.” The Plaintiffs suffered injuries, such as the soft and scarcity salt, which require medical treatment for each of three weeks due to the foregoing accident.

【Ground of recognition” has no dispute, Gap 1 to 21, Eul 3 and 4.