1. The Defendant’s KRW 59,801,983 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from September 14, 2017 to July 25, 2019.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Following the occurrence of a disaster, each of the following facts is recognized as either a dispute between the parties, or as a whole for the purport of Gap evidence 1 through 3 (including each number), Eul evidence 1, the fact inquiry inquiry statement as of May 27, 2019, the results of physical assessment, and the whole pleadings.

On September 16, 2014, the Plaintiff, employed by the Defendant Company, was an employee in charge of the upstreaming of alternative cargo, is not a photograph of the other working vehicle that the Plaintiff submitted to explain the situation at the time of the accident, not a photograph of the right photograph, but a photograph of the other working vehicle that the Plaintiff submitted to explain the situation at the time of the accident.

As seen above, the Defendant, while carrying out loading and unloading work by cutting out of the 1.5m door string at a temporary height of 1.5 meters from the height of truck loading boxes, was stated in disaster assessment books, etc. that “it was fall short of the vehicle’s boarding path on the ground that the Plaintiff was working outside the vehicle at the time,” and it was argued that it was difficult to view it as falling short of the vehicle’s loading and unloading work at a height of loading outside the vehicle (the preparatory document dated May 8, 2019). However, the Plaintiff was carrying five tons truck, which had been carrying the string of the string to outside the string box at the time, and there was no place of work for loading and unloading, and in order to install the string of the string to install the string on the string on the vehicle at the time, it is difficult to temporarily load the string to install the string on the string on the string off the string to install the string on the vehicle.