logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.09.17 2015고정1137
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000 ($00,000).

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 2014. 11. 11.경 범행 피고인은 2014. 11. 11. 20:00경 광주 북구 C에 있는 D의 집에서, 사실은 피해자 E과 F이 불륜 관계에 있지 않음에도 불구하고 F과 교제하다가 결별 통지를 받고는 화가 나 D에게 “E이 내가 F과 사귀는 것을 알면서도 F을 가로챘다, E이 남편 장례식장에서 웃으면서 손님을 맞이해서 F이 E에게 표정관리하라는 말을 했다, E과 F은 불륜관계다”라는 이야기를 하여, 공연히 허위 사실을 적시하여 피해자 F, E의 명예를 훼손하였다.

2. On November 2014, the Defendant committed the Middleman in order of November 2014, the Defendant undermined the honor of the victim F and E by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “A tea house located in the Pung-dong of Gwangju Northernbuk-gu, would be close to the F, E would have been elected as the head of the association, and E would not be ordinarily the same.”

3. On December 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed early December 2, 2014, 2014, the Defendant: (b) expressed that “Redevelopment F is male in the Dong-gu, Gwangju; (c) went to get elected as a head of the association; (d) thereby cutting off the F; and (e) destroyed the victim F and E’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol of interrogation of the police accused, K, and L (including F large part);

1. Each statement made by the police against F, J, D, and M;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the accusation report, the submission of N Letterss and reports, the investigation report on O telephone investigation, the investigation report on P telephone investigation, the investigation report on Mphones and the investigation report on M phone Statements (Evidence Nos. 1, 9, 11, 18, 19)

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act by selecting each of concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow