logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.06.02 2015고단1587
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was prosecuted for insurance fraud, and is a person who served as an insurance designer.

1. The Defendant and the Defendant, along with H, subscribed to multiple insurance contracts under the name of the insurance company as if they were daily workers belonging to the I office operated by the husband of H, with H, as if they were the daily workers belonging to the I office operated by the husband of H. The conclusion of the insurance contract, as if they were hospitalized in the hospital due to an injury in daily life, and were willing to claim insurance money by submitting a medical certificate and a certificate of entry and discharge to the insurance company.

In collusion with H on December 2, 2013, the Defendant sustained injury, even though there was no fact that L had been able to gling out in a marcuous mountain, in collusion with H, in the K marc department located in the J building at the time of Sinri-si.

In doing so, L was diagnosed by the Gyeong Daumumume, and received hospitalized treatment from the 16th day of the same month from the 16th day to the 16th day of the same month, and received L’s diagnosis, issuance of L’s written confirmation of entry and discharge certificate, and filed a claim for insurance money with the victim Samsung Y, and received KRW 840,000 as the NA account (M) in the Defendant’s name around December 23, 2013, and received KRW 840,00 as the insurance money. From around that time to September 2014, the 49 times in total by receiving KRW 31,435,365 from the victim insurance company as the insurance money.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with H to receive property by deceiving victims.

2. On or around March 30, 2009, the Defendant independently committed the Defendant’s single crime using the overlapping status of multiple insurance policies, such as the “Bra Ra 100” of the same fire in the Eastern Fire, the “health partnership insurance for the new era of the Non-Distribution Samsung Fire and Health Insurance,” the “LIG non-life insurance” (non-) LIG non-life insurance around December 14, 201, and the “LIG flus guarantee insurance” of the MIz fire around October 31, 201.

arrow