The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is that the Defendant did not assault the victim’s speed with drinking, such as the statement in the facts charged.

2. 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉, ① 피해자는 수사기관 및 원심 법정에서, 도로 위에서 피고인이 위험하게 운전을 하기에 항의를 하자, 피고인이 피해자를 � 아와 길을 막아선 다음 헬멧을 쓰고 있던 피해자의 턱 부위를 주먹으로 때렸다고

The statement was made by the victim's statement on the background of the assault or the part of the assault is specific and consistent, and ② the victim started to take a photograph by putting on all of the boomers, because the victim was assaulted by taking on the left side of the victim, who was coming off from the cliba to the victim by cliba.

According to the black stuff images taken at the time, if the defendant set up a stove in front of the victim and set up a stove in front of the victim in a street, and makes the victim's objection while putting the stove in front of the victim's left side, the injured person "I am special? I am special at the time I am. I am. I am. I am.

In full view of the fact that the Defendant could sufficiently recognize the fact of assaulting the victim as stated in the facts charged, and that the Defendant’s above assertion by the Defendant is without merit, inasmuch as it can be seen that the Defendant would drive away the Defendant’s rear her, and that it corresponds to the victim’s series of statements about the developments of assault, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.