1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the judgment of the court of first instance do not differ significantly from the allegations in the judgment of the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are judged to be justifiable even if it is judged again by the evidence adopted in the judgment of the court of first instance (in particular, the plaintiff prepared or revised a sales contract or a letter of contract in the process of selling the real estate in this case between the defendant B and the four persons, who are the purchaser, and at least five times, and the above sales contract or a letter of contract in each of the above sales contract or a letter of contract are not entirely stated as alleged by the plaintiff, and instead, as alleged by the defendants, only stated that "all facilities, equipment, and medical appliances within the real estate in this case include a total of KRW 9.6 billion" as alleged by the defendants. The reasons why the court stated

Except for the modification of the preceding part of paragraph (1)(judgments) as follows, it is identical to the part of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, it is also acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In light of the following circumstances, the amended part of the facts as seen above, quoted evidence, Eul evidence Nos. 2, 4, and 6, witness M of the first instance trial, and witness Nos. 1-1, 2, 3, and 9 (each content certification or notice) and the result of a partial party personal examination of the first instance court against the plaintiff is merely a statement or statement of the plaintiff's unilateral assertion, and it is difficult to believe it as it is. The evidence submitted by the plaintiff (the result of a partial statement or image of evidence Nos. 1 through 13, and a fact inquiry about the registration and fact inquiry about the Gwangju District Court's Branch Support) alone is sufficient to separately pay to the plaintiff KRW 275 million as the price for the facilities and equipment of the funeral hall of this case.