logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.08.13 2014가합57015
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The manager A and the rehabilitation company Namyang Construction Co., Ltd. of the Plaintiff’s rehabilitation corporation.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Korea National Housing Corporation is the party concerned. 5, Dong-dong 274, Dong-dong 274 (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”).

The Plaintiff is a seller newly built and sold. On October 1, 2009, the Plaintiff was the Korea National Housing Corporation and a public corporation established following the merger of the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, and the Korea Land and Housing Corporation (established by Act No. 9706, May 22, 2009) comprehensively succeeded to the assets, claims and obligations of the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, and other rights and obligations of the Korea Land and Housing Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) pursuant to Article 8(1) of the Addenda.

2) Defendant Godo Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Godo Construction”) and Songdo Comprehensive Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Song village Construction”) constitute a joint supply and demand organization and constitute a contract for construction, machinery, civil engineering, fire fighting, and sewage construction among the instant new apartment construction works.

Meanwhile, on May 6, 2009, the Songdo Construction was ordered to commence rehabilitation procedures by the Gwangju District Court 2009Kahap13 as of May 6, 2009, and Samdo Construction Co., Ltd. was ordered to commence rehabilitation procedures by the Gwangju District Court 2009Kahap15 as of May 6, 2009, and was authorized to decide to commence rehabilitation procedures on December 2, 2009, and approved a revised rehabilitation plan as of November 25, 2013, which was to merge the construction of Songdo and was under rehabilitation procedures as of December 3, 2013, and A is appointed as a manager.

(2) On December 27, 2010, the rehabilitation procedure is still in progress upon receiving a decision to commence the rehabilitation procedure from the Plaintiff on April 30, 2010, when the rehabilitation procedure was commenced on December 27, 2010, and the rehabilitation procedure is in progress after receiving a decision to authorize the rehabilitation plan as of December 27, 2010. The management manager A of the Defendant Samdo Construction Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant Samdo Construction Administrator”). 3 Southyang Construction Co., Ltd. was awarded a contract from the Plaintiff for landscaping among the instant new apartment construction works. The Namyang Construction Co., Ltd. received a decision to authorize the rehabilitation plan as of December 27, 2010.

arrow