1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, against A and Dong Construction Co., Ltd.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation on this part is as follows: ① Manager A of the Debtor Rehabilitation Obligors Construction Corporation (hereinafter "Defendant Samdo Construction") was appointed as the administrator of Samdo Construction Corporation (hereinafter "Defendant Samdo Construction Corporation") in Part 2 of Part 3 of Part 19 to Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance; ② The part of the part of the 2nd 3rd 5th 6-7 of the first 4th 6th 6-7 of the first 3rd 3rd 4th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 3th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 3th 6th 3rd 6th 6th 3th 6th 3th 6th 6th 3th 6th 6th 3rd 6th 6th 6th 3th 6th 6th 6th 3th 6th 6th 6th 201.

2. Determination as to the defense prior to the merits of the construction of the defendant Samdo Construction and the Dong Sub-Construction

A. The Plaintiff in this case, the summary of the assertion of Defendant Samdo Construction and East Construction.