1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged in full view of Gap evidence 1 through 5, Eul evidence 8, 9, Eul evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 3-1 and 2, Gap evidence 11-1 through 12, Eul evidence 3 and 6-2, Eul evidence 3 and 6-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings in the testimony of the witness of the first instance court C.

From February 2010, Defendant Korea contracted the above construction work to Defendant Han-han Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Han-gu Co., Ltd”) and Defendant Geum River Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Geum River”) while executing the national highway construction work between Ho-gu and Busan National Land Management Office through the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport’s Busan National Land Management.

B. Around December 2013, Defendant Han-gu National Highway Co., Ltd: (a) removed existing bridges, such as shot bridge, from the national highways 34 lines of the Yando-ri National Highway of the Yando-si, Yando-si; and (b) formulated an implementation plan for the construction of new roads by strengthening the ground and repackaginging the existing roads (hereinafter “instant construction”); and (c) formulated a transportation communication plan to secure the roads bypassing the existing national highways 34 lines that are cut down by shot bridge removal.

[2] Article 34 of the National Road Act and Article 34 of the former National Road Act (hereinafter referred to as the "former National Road 34" are as follows: (a) the point at which the route of the route of the route of the unlawful intersection is met is "the intersection of this case"; (b) the existing national highway 34 lines located in the direction of the field of the field of the field of the field of the route of the route of this case are as follows; and (c) the route of the route beginning from the point

The road of this case was cut off following the removal of shot bridge on January 1, 2014, when Defendant Han National University and Geum River were performing the construction of this case.

D (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) shall not enter the instant right-hand road from the point of the instant quarter during which he/she was driving a motor vehicle in the direction of the air direction (e.g., the e., the e., the e., the e. the e.b. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e.