Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7 million, by a fine of KRW 3 million, and by a fine of KRW 4 million.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 10, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime of Defendant A around 03:44, while drinking alcohol together with the Victim F (27 years of age) in Jung-gu, Daegu, Daegu, on the ground that the victim, who was a second half of the drinking water, she saw the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous thing for the victim to her hand, and her head was her hand, and her head was her head was her hand and her head was her head.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

2. The Defendants jointly committed the crimes of Defendant B and Defendant C when, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), the victim A (33 years of age) went to F due to beer disease, etc. as described in paragraph (1), and when the victim A (33 years of age) went to fright to fry him, Defendant B was tightly pushed the victim’s chest with both descendants, and Defendant C her was frightly pushed the victim’s chest with the victim’s chest, and Defendant C was frightly pushed the victim’s chest on one occasion by drinking. After then the victim was fright back to the above E, the victim was frighted one time, and a part of the victim’s hair was knee.

As a result, the defendants jointly suffered injuries, such as the 1 cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage fage

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 261 and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 261 of the Act; Article 260(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act; Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; the selection of fines;

1. The reason for sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the detention in the workhouse is that Defendant A was the injured party due to the beer and beer, which is a dangerous object, and the risk of the injured party serious harm is very poor in light of the fact that Defendant A was the injured party due to the beer and beer.

However, the defendant.