logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.07.25 2013고정5921
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 25, 2011, the defrauded concluded on May 15, 2011 that “If the Defendant lends money to the victim in a sudden need, he/she shall pay two copies of interest and pay the principal after one year.”

However, even if the victim borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

On May 25, 201, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 12 million from the victim to the Defendant’s national bank account on May 25, 201.

2. On July 25, 2012, the defrauded made a false statement to the victim at the same place on July 10, 2012, stating that “If the victim lends money to the victim, it would make a payment in the same manner as the previous borrowed money, if it is necessary to pay money.”

However, even if the victim borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

On July 25, 2012, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 3 million from the victim to the above account on July 25, 2012.

3. On June 25, 2012, the defrauded made a false statement to the victim stating that “The Defendant shall pay off the rent with three-paid interest at the same place on June 20, 2012. If the Defendant borrowed money, only two months shall be used and repaid.”

However, even if the victim borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

On June 25, 2012, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the above account on June 25, 2012, and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

4. On July 25, 2012, the defrauded, at the same place on July 25, 2012, concluded that “If the Defendant borrowed KRW 5 million to repay the borrowed money rapidly, he/she would recover the deposit even if he/she was paid the previous rent.”

However, even if the victim borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such.

arrow