logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.06.17 2014고합64
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall obtain a signature or seal from an elector for an election campaign.

Nevertheless, on November 2012, 2012, the Defendant issued a signature to C at a restaurant near the Seoul Station on the first and fourth day, stating that “D candidates can be elected,” with the letter of appointment of the “Special Committee on the Commission on Countermeasures against the Promotion of Freedom of the Central Headquarters for the Election of Candidates D(E Party),” and requested “the letter of appointment of the “Special Committee on the Promotion of Freedom of the Headquarters for the Election of Candidates” with the letter of appointment of the “Special Committee.”

C) On November 2012, 2012, C demanded H to sign the signature of H to the signature form, asserting support for the D candidate to the “G” operated by the “G” from the “G” in Yongcheon-si, Yongcheon-si, 2012.

In addition, C filed a signature in the signature form with a total of 94 electorates from November 2012 to November 30, 2012, upon protesting for support for D candidates in the above manner.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with C to obtain a signature from the electorate for the election campaign of the candidate for the 18th presidential election Eparty D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. A written answer to C, I, J, and K of the police preparation;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (including reports on mobile analysis of the digital investigation team of the Daegu High Prosecutors' Office, photographs of appointment, confirmation and reporting on distribution of receipts and disbursements, reporting on C telephone statement, C telephone statement hearing, C final and conclusive reporting, C telephone conversation and cash statement submission, etc.);

1. Article 255 (1) 18 and Article 107 of the Public Official Election Act and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

2. Determination as to the defendant's assertion under Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse

1. The gist of the Defendant’s assertion is that the Defendant met C in Seoul Station around November 2012.

However, the defendant is entitled to ‘E Party D'.

arrow