logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.17 2017나86400
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The circumstances leading to the instant accident are as follows.

On April 22, 2017, at the time of the accident, the insured vehicle A, the insured vehicle A, and the insured vehicle B, in the situation of road collision between the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle and the Defendant’s insured vehicle in front of Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju-gu, the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes, and the driver’s seat of the Defendant’s insured vehicle and the right side of the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle, which had been driven by the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle in front of the first vehicle for the purpose of the right of the right of the right of the right of the part of the vehicle, are paid for the conflict insurance proceeds and KRW 16,140,00 (based on recognition) KRW 50,00 of the self-liability of the insured vehicle in front of the collision amount. The fact that there is no dispute on the grounds of recognition, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Gap’s evidence Nos. 4 through

2. The Plaintiff asserted that the instant accident occurred due to the unilateral negligence of the Defendant’s insured vehicle, and claimed the full amount of the insurance money paid by the Plaintiff and the damages for delay from the day following the payment date. The Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle operator was negligent.

위 인정사실에 의하면, 이 사건 사고는 원고가 우회전을 하기 위하여 오른쪽 깜빡이를 켜고 우회전을 하던 중 도로의 오른쪽 가장자리를 서행하여야 함에도 불구하고 왼쪽으로 크게 돌 생각에 1차선의 일부를 침범하는 형태로 우회전을 시도한 과실과 선행차량이 오른쪽 깜빡이를 켜면서 우회전할 태세를 보이고 있음에도 선행차량의 진로와 속도를 잘 살펴 자신이 운전하는 차량의 속력이나 방향을 조절하여야 할 주의의무를 소홀히 한 피고의 과실이 경합하여 발생한 것이고, 기록에 나타난 사고 경위, 충돌 부위 및 충격의 정도 등 제반 사정에 비추어 보면, 이 사건 사고에 관한 원고 피보험차량과 피고 피보험차량의 과실비율은 45:55로 봄이 상당하다....

arrow