1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The circumstances leading to the instant accident are as follows.

At the time of the accident, the insured vehicle A at the time of the insured vehicle A at the time of the accident, the insured vehicle A at the time of the accident, and at the location of 08:15 on October 23, 2017, the plaintiff's insured vehicle A at the location of Dongjak-dong, Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government for left turn to the left at the two-lanes of the collision situation, and the first top top top top top top top top of the insured vehicle, which was left left left at the front of the defendant's apartment Twitter at the two-lane, was paid at the right side of the insured vehicle of the plaintiff, and 374,200,200 won of the insured vehicle's insurance money paid at the 574,20,000 won in the right side of the insured vehicle of the plaintiff. The fact that there is no dispute about the plaintiff's self-paid vehicle's insured vehicle's insured vehicle's own share in

2. The plaintiff asserted that the accident in this case occurred due to the negligence of the driver of the insured vehicle of this case. Thus, the plaintiff asserts that C is subrogated to C's claim for damages based on subrogation of the insurer as to the part of the damage inflicted on the insured vehicle of this case due to the damage of the vehicle.

The defendant asserts that the accident of this case occurred solely by the plaintiff's insured vehicle's intrusion on the two-lanes without complying with the vehicle line in which the plaintiff's insured vehicle was in progress.

Judgment

In light of all the circumstances, such as the background of the accident revealed in the above recognition (the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle and the Defendant’s insured vehicle were to turn to the left, and the Defendant’s insured vehicle was expected to turn to the yellow and to turn to the yellow soon before the signal was changed, it appears that they tried to turn to the front rather than the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle at a sudden speed before the signal was changed), the collision side (the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle is the right side in case of the Plaintiff, the Defendant’s insured vehicle is the front line in case of the Defendant), and the degree of shock, etc., the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle and the Defendant’s insured vehicle regarding the instant accident.