Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million by the Daejeon District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

At around 04:30 on July 31, 2019, the Defendant driven a DNA-learning car on the front of the Daejeon East-gu CKa Center, Daejeon, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.057% of blood alcohol level.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol twice.

Defendant

In addition, there is no infringement of the right of defense of the counsel, so the criminal facts were revised in order to clarify the purpose.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. E statements;

1. The fact-finding report on the actual condition of a drinking driver, the report on detection of a drinking driver, the report on the actual status of a drinking driver, the circumstantial report on a drinking driver, and the inquiry into the results of the crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Registers of driver's licenses, chassiss, and certificates of motor vehicle insurance;

1. An accident site and a photograph of drinking;

1. Previous convictions: Criminal records, investigation reports (verification of the same criminal records as suspects), and copies of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act of the choice of punishment, the selection of a fine (in light of the danger and seriousness of harmful effects of drinking driving, and the circumstances in which the accident occurred at the time, the liability for the relevant crime is unsatisfy, and the degree of misunderstanding is unsatisfy in depth, and the degree of blood alcohol content at the time is not relatively high, and the victim was not injured, and the victim was not injured, and the agreement was reached in full with the victim was reached, and there were favorable circumstances such as the circumstances of around 208, although the first head was the same kind of

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;