The defendant shall be innocent.

The Defendant is a public official who was in charge of ordering and supervising the “F Corporation G business” pumps installation works from January 24, 2009 to July 31, 2013 while serving as a person in charge of E affiliated therewith from around July 24, 2013, and H is a representative director of the LA and the J are business.

In around the end of 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the Kimcheon-si Office, Kimcheon-si 1-ro, Kim Jong-si (Newdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu, the Defendant agreed to grant a free contract agreement to the Daegu-gu Local Government Public Procurement Service to purchase the pumps by a private contract around March 2013; (b) accordingly,

Above June 2013, the Defendant

7. He was awarded KRW 20 million in cash, which was offered from H to the road side in the vicinity of the Imyang Office in the Gu K building B, in the early in the middle of the Homan-si, to the meaning of giving rewards for ordering the construction project and convenience in the future in the process of inspection, delivery, and installation in the future.

Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe in relation to the public official's duties.

Judgment

The establishment of facts constituting an offense in the relevant criminal trial ought to be based on strict evidence with probative value, which leads a judge to have a reasonable doubt, to such a degree that there is no room for a reasonable doubt. Therefore, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof fails to sufficiently reach the extent that such conviction would lead to such a conviction, even if the Defendant’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable, it should be determined in the interests of the Defendant.

In addition, the above strict proof includes all the specific criminal facts stated in the indictment by the prosecutor, and in particular, the date and time of the crime specified in the indictment is the main object of the defendant's right to defend.