1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked.

2. The plaintiff (appointed party) and the plaintiff as to the above revoked part.

1. Conclusion, etc. of wage agreements;

A. The Defendant is a company running the taxi transport business in Kimpo-si, and the Plaintiff and the designated parties are employed by the Defendant, and they are working or retired as a taxi engineer until now.

B. On April 21, 2016, the Defendant entered into a wage agreement (hereinafter “instant wage agreement”) with the Korea Trade Union Section B (Representative S) and B Trade Union (Representative T) to increase transportation income from 130,000 to 138,000 won, and to reduce transportation income from less than one year to 4,000 won. As a basic policy, both labor and management entered into a wage agreement (hereinafter “instant wage agreement”).

C. According to the wage table attached to the wage agreement of this case, “21 won per liter for fuel payment for workers who have been employed for less than one year 95 hours x 13 days x 221 won for fuel payment for 351 liter and 95 hours x 105 hours x 105 hours for fuel payment.”

At the time of the instant wage agreement, 49 taxi drivers belonging to the Defendant were 49, and 41 taxi drivers who were enrolled in the Korea Trade Union B and B Trade Union.

E. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff and the selected parties L, M, N,O, P, and Q are workers of less than one year but less than two years, and the selected parties C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K are workers of less than one year.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 4, Eul evidence 10, 11, 13 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the above facts, the wage agreement of this case and the wage table of this case are at least 351 liter monthly average of 95 hours for the plaintiff and the designated parties, who are the taxi engineers under their jurisdiction, respectively. The wage agreement of this case and the wage table of this case are at least 1 year and 2 years.