Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court 2011Nu15178 (Law No. 11, 2012)
Case Number of the previous trial
National Tax Service Review Division 2010-0015 (28 May 2010)
Title
(B) An operator operating a gas station who has received a false tax invoice from the supplier.
Summary
(main point of view) A business operator operating a gas station who has received a tax invoice different from the fact, and because he was negligent in not knowing such fact, the disposition on which the value-added tax is imposed by deducting the input tax amount is legitimate.
Related statutes
Article 17 of the Value-Added Tax Act
Cases
2012Du4432 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing Value-Added Tax
Plaintiff-Appellee
XX Co., Ltd
Defendant-Appellant
Head of Suwon Tax Office
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2011Nu15178 Decided January 11, 2012
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
While examining the grounds of appeal in comparison with the records of this case and the judgment of the court below, the ground of appeal on the grounds of appeal is not deemed to have been rejected or not.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.
Reference materials.
If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final