Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CM car.

On January 20, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car on January 11, 201:55, and proceeded from the viewing side to the viewing 60 km of Bosa City, which is a one-lane road, to the viewing side.

Since there is a center line of yellow solid lines, in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the full part of the E 5-si driving of the victim D(the age of 53) in the opposite part due to the negligence of the Defendant driving the central line, as the right side of the car driving by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, the injury of fresh fresh, etc., which requires approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment to the victim FF (5 years of age), such as cresh fresh fresh, which requires approximately 3 weeks of medical treatment to the victim G (5 years of age), and the victim G (54 years of age) who fresh fresh fresh fresh fresh fresh fresh, etc., which requires approximately 4 weeks of medical treatment to the victim H (5 years of age) who fresh fresh fresh fresh fresh fresh fresh fresh, etc., which requires approximately 7 weeks of medical treatment to the victim I (5 years of age) who was fresh in the above taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. A medical certificate (D);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. As to the fact that the Defendant, under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, led to the injury of several victims due to his or her failure to drive the crime of this case.