1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on January 28, 2016 by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on the case shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Basic facts

(a) The Plaintiff’s name of the invention(A) of this case (Evidence 2, B No. 1): 5 of the luminous Doz. (No. 1: 2 of the Doz. Doz. Doz. 1; hereinafter “No. 5 of the Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. 1 of the 2012 / 212 / 14/ 2013 / 100 / 10 Doz. 10-70215 / 3 of the 2015) Claim No. 1 of the Doz. Doz. 4 of the Daz. Doz. (U. Doz. 2 of this case); Doz. Doz. Doz. 1 of this case; Doz. Doz. 1 of this case; Doz. Doz. 1 of this case (hereinafter “N. Doz. 2 of this case”).

In order to form an organic-organic pattern pattern in the past, the so-called so-called polystyp sheet which is mixed in large amounts of flass or flass flass or carzers in the flood or brusing agents are commercialized.

However, it is screened, among previous technologies, to make an internship on such Doctrine.