The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal revealed that the defendant, who was aware of as D organization members, inflicted an injury on the victim at the end of the minor dispute in which the defendant drinks alcoholic beverages in a restaurant with the victim E. However, the court below found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged, in spite of the absence of the fact that the plaintiff had been exposed to gas bags, which are dangerous objects, such as the facts charged, or gas bags (hereinafter “clocks”), face of the victim by taking advantage of such dangerous objects as indicated in the facts charged, and thus, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts.

2. The lower court consistently stated that the following circumstances acknowledged by the witness H’s legal statement, the details of the I Hospital’s medical examination and treatment, and the details of the J’s medical examination and treatment, etc., of the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court: (i) the victim from the investigative agency to the lower court; (ii) the victim was in a state where he or she was found to have lost his or her name when he or she completed food service; and (iii) the Defendant was in a situation where he or she was faced with her her her her armistice and faced with the victim. Although her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her ve her her her her her her her her her her her her.