A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 20, 2015, around 21:40 on August 20, 2015, the Defendant was using a taxi driver and a trial expenses in front of Busan Seo-gu C.

At that time, the defendant sent the 112 report call to the police officer and sent a taxi engineer after witnessing the light border and stopping the time, and sent the taxi engineer to the defendant's house to return home to the police officer. The defendant sent the police officer the franch, sent the franch, and sent the franch to the police officer so that E, etc. do not get aboard the patrol vehicle. The defendant sent the franch, sent the franch, sent the franch, and sent the fransh with the flab, and flabed the flab by the flab and the flabed hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused;

1. Application of the statement protocol, investigation report, and photographic Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged parts of the report to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. The execution of the sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is suspended by taking into account the following: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence]; (b) the basic area (from June to one year and four months) (the person who has been subject to special sentencing]; (c) there is no history of being punished due to interference with the performance of official duties; (d) there is no history of being punished due to interference with the performance of official duties; (e) the degree of interference with the performance of official